under s***g : Nature Cell Biology "Manuscript under consideration": Manuscript under: considerationeditor. Please note that manuscripts transferred to Scientific Reports must satisfy the policy requirements outlined here before being assigned to an editor. 3(Oxford Univ. Nature Communications (Nat Commun) Alternatively, authors may choose to request a fresh review, in which case they should not use the automated transfer link, and the editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). All authors should be included in reference lists unless there are six or more, in which case only the first author should be given, followed by 'et al.'. Yes, this is normal. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Privacy Policy. Please use the Nature Research Chemical Structures Guide and ChemDraw template to ensure that you prepare your figures in a format that will require minimal changes by our art and production teams. Failure to do so, or to adhere to the following guidelines, can significantly delay publication of your work. Within the source data file, each figure or table (in the main manuscript and in the Supplementary Information) containing relevant data should be represented by a single sheet in an Excel document, or a single .txt file or other file type in a zipped folder. This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. As part of the service offered by In Review, authors will be able to track the status of their manuscript thanks to a private peer review timeline, showing main events such as the recruitment of a reviewer or the receipt of a reviewer report. An excellent #engineering background (Poly graduate turn PhD).<br> Experienced lab-to-field engineer (Leading researchers out of laboratory for real-world field trials).<br> Advocate for #ASTAR (Promoting science and innovation). the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Is it under review by the reviewers? From today, our authors have the option to take advantage of In Review, a free preprint deposition service integrated with the submission process to our journal. It only takes a minute to sign up. 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. But, after that, the status still displays "Manuscript under consideration" for 23 days. In any case, there's nothing to do except wait and see. - Pranav Pandit Jul 11, 2018 at 22:18 Add a comment 2 Answers Sorted by: 1 Pages should be numbered using an Arabic numeral in the footer of each page. File sizes should be as small as possible, with a maximum size of 30 MB, so that they can be downloaded quickly. How to tell which packages are held back due to phased updates. Nature Communications is read by scientists from diverse backgrounds. Nature. Thank you for your question. Cambrian lobopodians and extant onychophorans provide new insights into early cephalization in Panarthropoda. Nature Communications has a 2-year impact factor of 17.7 (2021), article downloads of 85,307,200 (2021), and 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision. An example source data file is available demonstrating the correct format. Languages English Espaol Portugus Research Creative My Account Submit My Manuscript [CDATA[// > All Rights Reserved. For final page size please use our column widths as a guide. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Did this satellite streak past the Hubble Space Telescope so close that it was out of focus? How many weeks of holidays does a Ph.D. student in Germany have the right to take? We strongly believe in the importance of this practice to increase transparency in the research process and to speed up the dissemination and re-use of scientific results, while maintaining that a rigorous peer-review (normally coordinated as part of the publication process in a journal) is needed to validate the findings. Any Supplementary Information should be submitted with the manuscript and will be sent to referees during peer review. Where unavoidable, abbreviations should be defined in the text or legends at their first occurrence, and abbreviations should be used thereafter. What happen if the reviewer reject, but the editor give major revision? This page includes information on manuscripts reviewed at other Nature journals, competing interests declarations, pre-publication publicity, deposition of data as a condition of publication, availability of data and reagents after publication, human and animal subjects, digital image integrity, biosecurity, refutations, complaints, correction of mistakes, duplicate publication, confidentiality and plagiarism. Thus, technical jargon should be avoided as far as possible and clearly explained where its use is unavoidable. Once the manuscript is published, the preprint will link to the published version. Authors should use approved nomenclature for gene symbols, and use symbols rather than italicized full names (for exampleTtn, nottitin). [CDATA[// >

James Clement Survivor Knee Injury, Christopher John Taylor, Livingston County Zoning Map, Articles M